Have you caught yourself wondering if this whole AI craze in education will really amount to much? Sure, there are the true believers gushing about how transformative it’s going to be (I know. I’m one of them). But then you’ve got the skeptics, giving you that knowing look, “Yeah, they said computers were going to change everything too, and look how that turned out.”
It’s a fair critique, and I’ve heard it quite a bit recently. Cast your mind back to the 80s and 90s when computing power started infiltrating classrooms. There was no shortage of bold predictions about how this new technology would usher in an era of personalized, self-paced learning tailored to each student’s strengths. Engagement would skyrocket as kids navigate digital worlds more captivating than any textbook. And we’d be preparing the workforce of tomorrow, imparting crucial tech literacy from day one. It started out so great. Educational games abounded. We brought our students to the computer lab to explore the Oregon Trail, to play math games, and the reasons to learn how to type became critical to be future ready.
Exciting stuff, no doubt. But did those lofty promises really come to fruition? Computer terminals may have sprung up like mushrooms after a rainstorm, but their impact was ultimately pretty hit-or-miss. For every teacher who brilliantly wove the machines into inventive lesson plans, there were just as many who struggled to make them more than glorified typewriters. The revolution proved more evolutionary than revolutionary.
Then along came the internet in the late 90s, and we were off to the races again with another supposed game-changer for education. This vast interconnected network would open universes of knowledge, enabling globe-spanning collaborations and dissolving classroom walls. Virtual classes could bring premier instructors to even the most remote locales. The possibilities seemed boundless…until reality struck once more. Yes, the internet democratized information access in powerful ways, and yes we had students writing to other students across the world, and I remember a particular class writing to astronauts at NASA for a project…and getting a response! But its assimilation into pedagogy has proven slow and uneven, hamstrung by everything from skeptical administrators to inadequate training.
All of which brings us to the present AI moment – another eruption of feverish expectation clashing with understandable trepidation about disruptions overpromised. There’s legitimate potential in AI’s ability to automate rote tasks, generate dynamic content matched to personal interests/abilities, and provide anytime tutoring. But how many grand ideas about “revolutionizing” education have you heard before and look where we are – more skills to teach, more communication – more work.
The throughline seems to be that technology alone is rarely the solution. Artificial intelligence may be extraordinarily powerful, but it’s still just a tool like any other. Its impact depends entirely on the hands that wield it. Lecturing at kids while an AI churns out busywork isn’t terribly different from teaching through a textbook. But an educator adeptly integrating AI into a thoughtful, student-centered workflow? That’s when we might finally see lasting reinvention.
As ever, ed reform remains a dance between technological possibility and human resolve to reimagine best practices. Are we up for the dance? The AI model can’t tell you that. Only your passion as an educator can decide if it becomes a clunky overhead projector or a literal augmentation of your powers as a catalyst of young minds.
UnconstrainED 
Leave a comment